Admissibility of evidence must be established to be which of the following?

Admissibility of evidence must be established to be which of the following?

• A. Irrelevant and inadmissible
• B. Relevant and real
• C. Inconclusive and circumstantial
• D. Indirect and testimonial

Answer: (B)

The correct choice emphasizes that the admissibility of evidence hinges on its relevance and its nature as real evidence. Relevant evidence is that which has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. This is a fundamental principle in legal proceedings, as evidence must assist in proving or disproving an element of the case to be deemed admissible. The term "real" in this context refers to physical evidence that can be presented in court, such as objects, documents, or other tangible items. Real evidence is often considered more compelling than other types, such as testimony, because it provides a direct link to the events in question. For evidence to be admissible, it must not only be relevant but also meet other legal criteria, such as being obtained lawfully and not being prejudicial. This combination of relevance and the nature of real evidence allows it to effectively contribute to the fact-finding process in a legal context. In contrast, the other options describe characteristics that do not contribute positively to the admissibility of evidence in court. Irrelevant evidence cannot serve the purpose of supporting or negating a point, and inconclusive or circumstantial evidence alone may not suffice to establish critical facts without additional supportive evidence. Indirect

The correct choice emphasizes that the admissibility of evidence hinges on its relevance and its nature as real evidence. Relevant evidence is that which has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. This is a fundamental principle in legal proceedings, as evidence must assist in proving or disproving an element of the case to be deemed admissible.

The term "real" in this context refers to physical evidence that can be presented in court, such as objects, documents, or other tangible items. Real evidence is often considered more compelling than other types, such as testimony, because it provides a direct link to the events in question.

For evidence to be admissible, it must not only be relevant but also meet other legal criteria, such as being obtained lawfully and not being prejudicial. This combination of relevance and the nature of real evidence allows it to effectively contribute to the fact-finding process in a legal context.

In contrast, the other options describe characteristics that do not contribute positively to the admissibility of evidence in court. Irrelevant evidence cannot serve the purpose of supporting or negating a point, and inconclusive or circumstantial evidence alone may not suffice to establish critical facts without additional supportive evidence. Indirect