What strategy should a witness employ if the defense attorney repeats questions to elicit inconsistent answers?

What strategy should a witness employ if the defense attorney repeats questions to elicit inconsistent answers?

• A. Provide correct answers patiently
• B. Answer the questions with uncertainty
• C. Demand to speak to a judge
• D. Show frustration at the repeated questioning

Answer: (A)

A witness should indeed provide correct answers patiently in situations where a defense attorney repeats questions to seek inconsistent responses. This approach is vital for maintaining credibility and composure during the legal process. By answering consistently and calmly, the witness reinforces their reliability and helps to ensure that the truth of their testimony remains clear to all parties involved, including the judge and jury. Remaining patient also minimizes the potential for misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the witness's statements, which could arise if they become confused or rattled by the repeated questioning. This strategy highlights the importance of maintaining a steady demeanor, which can positively influence the perception of the witness's reliability in the eyes of those evaluating the case. Other strategies, such as expressing uncertainty or frustration, could undermine the witness's credibility or create a perception of evasiveness, which is not desired in a courtroom setting. Moreover, demanding to speak to a judge could disrupt the proceedings and might not be appropriate or effective in addressing the situation at hand.

A witness should indeed provide correct answers patiently in situations where a defense attorney repeats questions to seek inconsistent responses. This approach is vital for maintaining credibility and composure during the legal process. By answering consistently and calmly, the witness reinforces their reliability and helps to ensure that the truth of their testimony remains clear to all parties involved, including the judge and jury.

Remaining patient also minimizes the potential for misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the witness's statements, which could arise if they become confused or rattled by the repeated questioning. This strategy highlights the importance of maintaining a steady demeanor, which can positively influence the perception of the witness's reliability in the eyes of those evaluating the case.

Other strategies, such as expressing uncertainty or frustration, could undermine the witness's credibility or create a perception of evasiveness, which is not desired in a courtroom setting. Moreover, demanding to speak to a judge could disrupt the proceedings and might not be appropriate or effective in addressing the situation at hand.